Ember Polaris vs Qwik: A Comprehensive Comparison
This website is powered by ItGalaxy.io
In the world of frontend development, Ember Polaris and Qwik represent two different philosophies for building web applications. While Ember Polaris brings modern features to the Ember ecosystem with Glimmer components and strict-mode JavaScript, Qwik offers a revolutionary approach with resumability and instant load times. Let’s explore their differences and use cases.
Table of Contents
- Core Concepts
- Reactivity and State Management
- Templating and Components
- DOM Manipulation
- Event Handling
- Component Composition
- Form Handling
- Lifecycle Management
- Performance and Bundle Size
- Learning Curve
- Conclusion
Core Concepts
Ember Polaris and Qwik take fundamentally different approaches to building web applications:
- Ember Polaris uses a modern, class-based component model with Glimmer templates and strict-mode JavaScript
- Qwik uses resumability and fine-grained lazy loading to achieve instant load times and optimal performance
Reactivity and State Management
State Declaration
Both frameworks offer different ways to declare and manage state:
Ember Polaris’s Approach
// name.gjs
import Component from "@glimmer/component";
export default class NameComponent extends Component {
name = "John";
<template>
<h1>Hello {{this.name}}</h1>
</template>
}
Ember Polaris uses class-based components with template syntax.
Qwik’s Approach
// Name.tsx
import { component$, useSignal } from "@builder.io/qwik";
export const Name = component$(() => {
const name = useSignal("John");
return <h1>Hello {name.value}</h1>;
});
Qwik uses signals and components with fine-grained reactivity.
State Updates
Ember Polaris’s Approach
// name.gjs
import Component from "@glimmer/component";
import { tracked } from "@glimmer/tracking";
export default class CounterComponent extends Component {
@tracked name = "John";
constructor(owner, args) {
super(owner, args);
this.name = "Jane";
}
<template>
<h1>Hello {{this.name}}</h1>
</template>
}
Qwik’s Approach
// Name.tsx
import { component$, useTask$, useSignal } from "@builder.io/qwik";
export const Name = component$(() => {
const name = useSignal("John");
useTask$(() => {
name.value = "Jane";
});
return <h1>Hello {name.value}</h1>;
});
Computed Properties
Ember Polaris’s Approach
// double-count.gjs
import Component, { tracked } from "@glimmer/component";
export default class DoubleCount extends Component {
@tracked count = 10;
get doubleCount() {
return this.count * 2;
}
<template>
<div>{{this.doubleCount}}</div>
</template>
}
Qwik’s Approach
// DoubleCount.tsx
import { component$, useSignal, useComputed$ } from "@builder.io/qwik";
export const DoubleCount = component$(() => {
const count = useSignal(10);
const doubleCount = useComputed$(() => count.value * 2);
return <div>{doubleCount.value}</div>;
});
DOM Manipulation
List Rendering
Ember Polaris’s Approach
// colors.gjs
const colors = ["red", "green", "blue"];
<template>
<ul>
{{#each colors as |color|}}
<li>{{color}}</li>
{{/each}}
</ul>
</template>
Qwik’s Approach
// Colors.tsx
import { component$ } from "@builder.io/qwik";
export const Colors = component$(() => {
const colors = ["red", "green", "blue"];
return (
<ul>
{colors.map((color) => (
<li key={color}>{color}</li>
))}
</ul>
);
});
Event Handling
Ember Polaris’s Approach
// counter.gjs
import Component from "@glimmer/component";
import { tracked } from "@glimmer/tracking";
import { on } from "@ember/modifier";
export default class Counter extends Component {
@tracked count = 0;
incrementCount = () => this.count++;
<template>
<p>Counter: {{this.count}}</p>
<button {{on "click" this.incrementCount}}>+1</button>
</template>
}
Qwik’s Approach
// Counter.tsx
import { component$, useSignal, $ } from "@builder.io/qwik";
export const Counter = component$(() => {
const count = useSignal(0);
const incrementCount = $(() => {
count.value++;
});
return (
<>
<p>Counter: {count.value}</p>
<button onClick$={incrementCount}>Increment</button>
</>
);
});
Form Handling
Text Input
Ember Polaris’s Approach
// input-hello.gjs
import Component from "@glimmer/component";
import { tracked } from "@glimmer/tracking";
import { on } from '@ember/modifier';
export default class InputHello extends Component {
@tracked text = "Hello World";
handleInput = (event) => (this.text = event.target.value);
<template>
<p>{{this.text}}</p>
<input value={{this.text}} {{on "input" this.handleInput}} />
</template>
}
Qwik’s Approach
// InputHello.tsx
import { component$, useSignal } from "@builder.io/qwik";
const InputHello = component$(() => {
const text = useSignal("");
return (
<>
<p>{text.value}</p>
<input bind:value={text} />
</>
);
});
Lifecycle Management
Component Mounting
Ember Polaris’s Approach
// page-title.gjs
const pageTitle = () => document.title;
<template>
<p>Page title is: {{(pageTitle)}}</p>
</template>
Qwik’s Approach
// PageTitle.tsx
import { component$, useVisibleTask$, useStore } from "@builder.io/qwik";
export const App = component$(() => {
const store = useStore({
pageTitle: "",
});
useVisibleTask$(() => {
store.pageTitle = document.title;
});
return <p>Page title: {store.pageTitle}</p>;
});
Performance and Bundle Size
Ember Polaris
- Modern build pipeline
- Glimmer VM for efficient rendering
- Tree shaking support
- Optimized for large applications
Qwik
- Revolutionary resumability approach
- Zero hydration
- Fine-grained lazy loading
- Instant load times
- Optimal performance at scale
Learning Curve
Ember Polaris
- Steeper learning curve
- Class-based components
- Strong conventions
- Rich ecosystem to learn
- Modern JavaScript features
Qwik
- Moderate learning curve
- React-like JSX syntax
- Modern TypeScript features
- Build tools required
- New concepts (resumability, lazy loading)
Conclusion
Choose Ember Polaris if you:
- Need a full-featured enterprise framework
- Value strong conventions
- Want modern class-based components
- Are building large-scale applications
- Need robust tooling support
- Plan to scale your application significantly
Choose Qwik if you:
- Need instant load times
- Want optimal performance at scale
- Value fine-grained lazy loading
- Are building large applications
- Need resumability features
- Want modern development features
Both frameworks excel in different scenarios:
- Ember Polaris shines in building large-scale applications that benefit from strong conventions and modern features
- Qwik excels in building high-performance applications that need instant load times and optimal scalability
The choice between Ember Polaris and Qwik often depends on your project’s requirements:
- Use Ember Polaris for building complex enterprise applications that benefit from strong conventions
- Use Qwik for building modern applications that need instant load times and optimal performance at scale
Decouvrez plus d’Offres de la plateform ItGalaxy.io :
Découvrez notre gamme complète de services et formations pour accélérer votre carrière.
1. Nous contactez
- Description: Besoin de Formation et des Solutions cloud complètes pour vos applications
- Links:
2. Infra as a Service
- Description: Infrastructure cloud évolutive et sécurisée
- Links:
3. Projets Développeurs
- Description: Découvrez des opportunités passionnantes pour les développeurs
- Links:
4. Développeurs
- Description: Rejoignez notre communauté de développeurs
- Links:
5. Formations Complètes
- Description: Accédez à des formations professionnelles de haute qualité
- Links:
6. Marketplace
- Description: Découvrez notre place de marché de services
- Links:
7. Blogs
- Description: Découvrez nos blogs
- Links:
- comment creer une application mobile ?
- Comment monitorer un site web ?
- Command Checkout in git ?
- Comment git checkout to commit ?
- supprimer une branche git
- dockercoin
- kubernetes c est quoi
- architecture kubernetes
- Installer Gitlab Runner ?
- .gitlab-ci.yml exemples
- CI/CD
- svelte 5 vs solid
- svelte vs lit
- solidjs vs qwik
- alpine vs vue
- Plateform Freelance 2025
- Creation d’un site Web gratuitement
This website is powered by ItGalaxy.io