React vs Marko: A Comprehensive Comparison

This website is powered by ItGalaxy.io

In the world of frontend development, React and Marko represent different philosophies for building web applications. While React focuses on component-based architecture with JSX, Marko offers a unique template-first approach with powerful built-in features. Let’s explore their differences and use cases.

Table of Contents

  1. Core Concepts
  2. Reactivity and State Management
  3. Templating and Components
  4. Styling Approaches
  5. Component Lifecycle
  6. Form Handling
  7. Performance and Features
  8. Learning Curve
  9. Conclusion

Core Concepts

React and Marko take fundamentally different approaches to building user interfaces:

  • React uses JSX and a Virtual DOM with component-based architecture
  • Marko uses a template-first approach with built-in streaming and async rendering

Reactivity and State Management

React’s Approach

React uses hooks for state management:

import { useState } from "react";

export default function Counter() {
  const [count, setCount] = useState(0);

  function incrementCount() {
    setCount((count) => count + 1);
  }

  return (
    <>
      <p>Counter: {count}</p>
      <button onClick={incrementCount}>+1</button>
    </>
  );
}

Marko’s Approach

Marko uses a more declarative, template-first approach:

<let/count = 0/>
<p>Counter: ${count}</p>
<button onClick() { count++ }>+1</button>

Key differences:

  • React requires explicit state updates through setters
  • Marko allows direct variable mutations
  • Marko’s syntax is more concise and template-focused

Templating and Components

React Components

React combines JavaScript and JSX:

export default function HelloWorld() {
  return <h1>Hello world</h1>;
}

Marko Components

Marko uses a more HTML-like syntax:

<h1>Hello world</h1>

Conditional Rendering

React Conditionals

React uses JavaScript expressions:

{
  light === "red" && <span>STOP</span>;
}
{
  light === "orange" && <span>SLOW DOWN</span>;
}
{
  light === "green" && <span>GO</span>;
}

Marko Conditionals

Marko provides built-in directives:

<if=light === "red">STOP</if>
<else-if=light === "orange">SLOW DOWN</else-if>
<else>GO</else>

Loops and Iterations

React Loops

React uses JavaScript’s map function:

<ul>
  {colors.map((color) => (
    <li key={color}>{color}</li>
  ))}
</ul>

Marko Loops

Marko provides a dedicated syntax:

<ul>
  <for|color| of=["red", "green", "blue"]>
    <li>${color}</li>
  </for>
</ul>

Async Data Handling

React Async

React requires explicit state management:

const { isLoading, error, data: users } = useFetchUsers();

return (
  <>
    {isLoading ? (
      <p>Fetching users...</p>
    ) : error ? (
      <p>An error occurred</p>
    ) : (
      <UserList users={users} />
    )}
  </>
);

Marko Async

Marko provides built-in async support:

<await(fetch("https://api.example.com/users").then(res => res.json()))>
  <@placeholder>
    <p>Fetching users...</p>
  </@placeholder>
  <@catch|error|>
    <p>An error occurred</p>
  </@catch>
  <@then|users|>
    <UserList users=users/>
  </@then>
</await>

Performance and Features

React

  • Virtual DOM-based updates
  • Client-side rendering focused
  • Manual optimization needed
  • Separate SSR setup required
  • Large ecosystem of tools

Marko

  • Streaming by default
  • Built-in SSR and hydration
  • Automatic optimization
  • Smaller bundle sizes
  • Compiler-optimized output

Learning Curve

React

  • Familiar JavaScript-centric approach
  • Large ecosystem
  • Extensive documentation
  • Many learning resources
  • Complex state management patterns

Marko

  • New template syntax to learn
  • Smaller ecosystem
  • Less documentation
  • Fewer learning resources
  • Simpler state management

Conclusion

Choose React if you:

  • Need a large ecosystem of tools and libraries
  • Want extensive community support
  • Prefer a JavaScript-first approach
  • Need complex state management solutions
  • Have a team familiar with JSX
  • Want maximum flexibility

Choose Marko if you:

  • Need excellent performance out of the box
  • Want built-in streaming and async support
  • Prefer a template-first approach
  • Need simpler state management
  • Want automatic optimization
  • Are building server-rendered applications

The choice between React and Marko often depends on your specific needs:

  • React excels in building complex single-page applications with rich interactivity
  • Marko shines in server-rendered applications with excellent performance requirements

Both frameworks have their strengths:

  • React offers a mature ecosystem and flexible architecture
  • Marko provides excellent performance and simpler templating

Key considerations:

  1. React’s JavaScript-first vs Marko’s template-first approach
  2. React’s explicit state management vs Marko’s simpler reactivity
  3. React’s large ecosystem vs Marko’s built-in features
  4. React’s client-side focus vs Marko’s server-side strengths

The future of web development may see more frameworks adopting Marko’s innovative features, but for now, both frameworks serve different needs effectively.





Decouvrez plus d’Offres de la plateform ItGalaxy.io :

Découvrez notre gamme complète de services et formations pour accélérer votre carrière.

1. Nous contactez

  • Description: Besoin de Formation et des Solutions cloud complètes pour vos applications
  • Links:

2. Infra as a Service

  • Description: Infrastructure cloud évolutive et sécurisée
  • Links:

3. Projets Développeurs

4. Développeurs

5. Formations Complètes

6. Marketplace

7. Blogs

This website is powered by ItGalaxy.io